Monday, April 26, 2010

Blog wrap-up

I have come to realize that for the most part this blog has failed to live up to its mission of providing a pro-working class perspective on issues relating to Northern California and Vallejo.  Even though the abuse unions endure in Vallejo from the local government and other voices on the web makes me angry, I'm not in a position to fight against these ideas as someone with no real ties to the area.  I hope to be able to make a more effective impact by volunteering for local progressive candidates.
As for posts relating to peace and international issues, its been great to share them with you, but an ounce of practice is worth a ton of theory and I realize that it would be better to write one letter to the editor of even a small newspaper than hundreds of blog posts.
If you want to keep up with me, what I'm reading and thinking, you can follow me on twitter @mardiddams.

Adieu, adios, asalaamalaikum.
mar

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

International Transport Workers' Federation: Press area

International Transport Workers' Federation: Press area

‘Time to beat piracy’ campaign announced
17 March 2010
Union representatives meeting in Berlin have voted to launch a new campaign to persuade all governments to commit the resources necessary to end the increasing problem of Somalia-based piracy.
Seafarers’ delegates at ITF meetings in Germany authorised the Federation to build a campaign that is hoped to deliver half a million signatures to governments by World Maritime Day, September 23rd. The campaign will call on them to close the circle on protection of ships, and for those states now ducking their responsibilities to stand up and follow the example of those which are actively involved in combating the threat.
The petition will call on nations to:
• Dedicate significant resources and work to find real solutions to the growing piracy problem.
• Take immediate steps to secure the release and safe return of kidnapped seafarers to their families
• Work within the international community to secure a stable and peaceful future for Somalia and its people
Speaking from Berlin, ITF Maritime Coordinator Steve Cotton said: “This decision has empowered us to build a worldwide campaign to put pressure on all governments to close the gap in their anti-piracy efforts. At the end of last year we warned that a point had been reached where the affected area had become too dangerous to enter, except in exceptional circumstances. We also highlighted the scandalous negligence of countries making billions from ships they are doing nothing to protect. There has been no improvement since then.”
He continued: “The reality is that seafarers are risking their lives transporting the world’s goods through areas that are daily growing more dangerous. That situation is not going to change without dramatic efforts to address the problems of Somalia and its people and grasp the nettle of confronting and prosecuting piracy.”
The Berlin meeting also agreed to support the inclusion, where appropriate, of armed military personnel on ships in addition to the commitment by flag states of naval vessels. The ITF remains firmly opposed to the arming of seafarers. It is also gravely concerned by attempts to prevent the payment of ransoms and considers that it is the duty of shipowners and flag states to take all necessary measures to swiftly reunite seafarers with their families when they are held hostage. The ITF also stated that it is unforgiveable that the major flag of convenience states have done little more to fight piracy than sign pieces of paper. They have taken no other concrete action, nor have they used their flag state jurisdiction to enable the prosecution of any pirates.
The ITF will now work on an e-petition website and a cross-industry international campaign intended to deliver a powerful message to governments on World Maritime Day.
ENDS
For more information contact ITF press officer, Sam Dawson.
Direct line: + 44 (0)20 7940 9260.
Email: dawson_sam@itf.org.uk
International Transport Workers' Federation - ITF:
HEAD OFFICE
ITF House, 49 - 60 Borough Road, London SE1 1DS
Tel: + 44 (0) 20 7403 2733
Fax: + 44 (0) 20 7375 7871
Email: mail@itf.org.uk
Web: www.itfglobal.org

Friday, March 12, 2010

Biography | Bill Nye the Science Guy

Biography | Bill Nye the Science Guy

from BillNye.com. An example of a famous engineer. My high school science teacher freshmen year had his autograph framed on his wall.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)

Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)
H.CON.RES.248
Title: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan.
Sponsor: Rep Kucinich, Dennis J. [OH-10] (introduced 3/4/2010)      Cosponsors (21)
Related Bills: H.RES.1146
Latest Major Action: 3/10/2010 Failed of passage/not agreed to in House. Status: On agreeing to the resolution Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 65 - 356 (Roll no. 98). 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), (Introduced in House)
HCON 248 IH

111th CONGRESS
2d Session

H. CON. RES. 248

Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

March 4, 2010

Mr. KUCINICH (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. FILNER, Mr. JONES, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. PAUL, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. MASSA, Mr. GRAYSON, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. SERRANO, and Mr. MICHAUD) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan.
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES FROM AFGHANISTAN.

    Pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544(c)), Congress directs the President to remove the United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan--
      (1) by no later than the end of the period of 30 days beginning on the day on which this concurrent resolution is adopted; or
      (2) if the President determines that it is not safe to remove the United States Armed Forces before the end of that period, by no later than December 31, 2010, or such earlier date as the President determines that the Armed Forces can safely be removed.

Monday, March 1, 2010

US POLICY IN AFGHANISTAN: TIME FOR A CHANGE Laurie Johnston National War College

http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA437594

This essay I found on WorldCat gives the political situation in Afghanistan following the withdrawal of the Red Army but before the People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan government was overthrown.  The anti-communist point of view shouldn't distract from many of the facts about US involvement in Afghanistan most of us haven't heard.  In 1991, when this report was written, two years has already passed since the Soviet Union withdrew and not only did the progressive government remain in place, it got stronger.  It would remain in place until April of 1992.  There is disturbing foretelling in the last pages of the report that "We are apparently supporting groups who are militarily and politically ineffective, and not likely to be pro-US in the long-run, so that we can stand firm against the USSR, with whom we increasingly cooperate", and that an institutional report would recommend cutting off money for a military solution and supplying humanitarian aid instead, all in 1991.

Looking at the corruption and unpopularity of the Karzai government now it seems that 1991 wasn't that long ago.  What you won't learn from the National War College is that all forms of intervention in Afghanistan or any nation are doomed to failure.  Like it says at the end of this report from 1991, in the Afghanistan of 2010 we need to:
  • Cease military action
  • Discuss a political settlement with the regional powers, e.g. the Shanghai Cooperation Organization
  • Continue humanitarian assistance through "other channels" i.e. ones without political loyalty to the US.

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Maritime Professional - NUSI threaten to boycott Gulf of Aden/Somalia coast

Maritime Professional - NUSI threaten to boycott Gulf of Aden/Somalia coast

The disregard for the lives of seafarers by shipping companies and world powers is disappointing. 200 merchant seamen are still being held for ransom by Somali pirates after the M.V. Al Khaliq was recently released. Piracy is a serious crime which became much more common near Somali waters after foreign companies eliminated the fisheries by overfishing and dumping toxic waste, causing fishermen to abandon legitimate business.

Disappointingly, the world powers have done nothing to deal with either the crime or the conditions that encourage the crime. To deal with the crime, merchant ships need to be equipped properly to resist boarding, with barriers like barbed wire around the deck, enough lookouts, and crew trained to use non-lethal techniques to repel pirates. There should also be naval escorts, with each country responsible for protecting the ships flying her flag or owned by her citizens, but because of the uneven distribution of world naval power a compromise should be reached so that nations with more naval power provide more naval escort vessels. The conditions need to be improved by banning exploitation or destruction of any of Somalia's natural resources by internationals.

None of this is being done now. I'm embarrassed that the US, with the largest navy and with businesses that own more than a thousand ships total (with most registered in other nations), can't protect the seafarers who create its wealth.

I agree with the National Union of Seafarers of India that if the situation doesn't improve, seafarers should refuse to sail through the Gulf of Aden and I hope this threat has the political effect it deserves.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Crime wave compounds bankrupt Vallejo's woes

Crime wave compounds bankrupt Vallejo's woes

A terrible week. What will it take for people to mobilize against the budget cuts in crime prevention? I wonder how many people who are affected by this crime are from the religious community that may have supported Osby Davis for his Christian values rather than asking about how the bankruptcy and the war on public service unions would affect regular communities. There are many churches in Vallejo, but whenever it comes to their politics all you mostly hear about are "social" issues like homosexuality.

Monday, February 8, 2010

Afghanistan: Is it all about terrorism? » peoplesworld

Afghanistan: Is it all about terrorism? » peoplesworld

Thanks to Sam Webb for his insight. How much does "oil" really have to do with the war in Afghanistan? Central Asia is a rich source of oil and natural gas and none of its former Soviet republics are members of OPEC. Maintaining the Afghan war makes sense from the perspective of preventing another oil embargo. Another reason this country is so quick to go to war is that we haven't completely accepted that we will need to share global power with China in the future, so cost is no object when it comes to stealing a venue to establish our influence from Beijing.

Peace
MAR