International Transport Workers' Federation: Press area

International Transport Workers' Federation: Press area

‘Time to beat piracy’ campaign announced

17 March 2010

Union representatives meeting in Berlin have voted to launch a new campaign to persuade all governments to commit the resources necessary to end the increasing problem of Somalia-based piracy.

Seafarers’ delegates at ITF meetings in Germany authorised the Federation to build a campaign that is hoped to deliver half a million signatures to governments by World Maritime Day, September 23rd. The campaign will call on them to close the circle on protection of ships, and for those states now ducking their responsibilities to stand up and follow the example of those which are actively involved in combating the threat.

The petition will call on nations to:

• Dedicate significant resources and work to find real solutions to the growing piracy problem.
• Take immediate steps to secure the release and safe return of kidnapped seafarers to their families
• Work within the international community to secure a stable and peaceful future for Somalia and its people

Speaking from Berlin, ITF Maritime Coordinator Steve Cotton said: “This decision has empowered us to build a worldwide campaign to put pressure on all governments to close the gap in their anti-piracy efforts. At the end of last year we warned that a point had been reached where the affected area had become too dangerous to enter, except in exceptional circumstances. We also highlighted the scandalous negligence of countries making billions from ships they are doing nothing to protect. There has been no improvement since then.”

He continued: “The reality is that seafarers are risking their lives transporting the world’s goods through areas that are daily growing more dangerous. That situation is not going to change without dramatic efforts to address the problems of Somalia and its people and grasp the nettle of confronting and prosecuting piracy.”

The Berlin meeting also agreed to support the inclusion, where appropriate, of armed military personnel on ships in addition to the commitment by flag states of naval vessels. The ITF remains firmly opposed to the arming of seafarers. It is also gravely concerned by attempts to prevent the payment of ransoms and considers that it is the duty of shipowners and flag states to take all necessary measures to swiftly reunite seafarers with their families when they are held hostage. The ITF also stated that it is unforgiveable that the major flag of convenience states have done little more to fight piracy than sign pieces of paper. They have taken no other concrete action, nor have they used their flag state jurisdiction to enable the prosecution of any pirates.

The ITF will now work on an e-petition website and a cross-industry international campaign intended to deliver a powerful message to governments on World Maritime Day.

ENDS

For more information contact ITF press officer, Sam Dawson.
Direct line: + 44 (0)20 7940 9260.
Email: dawson_sam@itf.org.uk

International Transport Workers' Federation - ITF:
HEAD OFFICE
ITF House, 49 - 60 Borough Road, London SE1 1DS
Tel: + 44 (0) 20 7403 2733
Fax: + 44 (0) 20 7375 7871
Email: mail@itf.org.uk
Web: www.itfglobal.org

Biography | Bill Nye the Science Guy

Biography | Bill Nye the Science Guy

from BillNye.com. An example of a famous engineer. My high school science teacher freshmen year had his autograph framed on his wall.

Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)

Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)
H.CON.RES.248
Title: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan.
Sponsor: Rep Kucinich, Dennis J. [OH-10] (introduced 3/4/2010)      Cosponsors (21)
Related Bills: H.RES.1146
Latest Major Action: 3/10/2010 Failed of passage/not agreed to in House. Status: On agreeing to the resolution Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 65 - 356 (Roll no. 98). 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), (Introduced in House)
HCON 248 IH

111th CONGRESS 2d Session
H. CON. RES. 248
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

March 4, 2010

Mr. KUCINICH (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. FILNER, Mr. JONES, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. PAUL, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. MASSA, Mr. GRAYSON, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. SERRANO, and Mr. MICHAUD) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

---

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan.

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES FROM AFGHANISTAN.

Pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544(c)), Congress directs the President to remove the United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan--

(1) by no later than the end of the period of 30 days beginning on the day on which this concurrent resolution is adopted; or

(2) if the President determines that it is not safe to remove the United States Armed Forces before the end of that period, by no later than December 31, 2010, or such earlier date as the President determines that the Armed Forces can safely be removed.

US POLICY IN AFGHANISTAN: TIME FOR A CHANGE Laurie Johnston National War College

http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA437594

This essay I found on WorldCat gives the political situation in Afghanistan following the withdrawal of the Red Army but before the People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan government was overthrown.  The anti-communist point of view shouldn't distract from many of the facts about US involvement in Afghanistan most of us haven't heard.  In 1991, when this report was written, two years has already passed since the Soviet Union withdrew and not only did the progressive government remain in place, it got stronger.  It would remain in place until April of 1992.  There is disturbing foretelling in the last pages of the report that "We are apparently supporting groups who are militarily and politically ineffective, and not likely to be pro-US in the long-run, so that we can stand firm against the USSR, with whom we increasingly cooperate", and that an institutional report would recommend cutting off money for a military solution and supplying humanitarian aid instead, all in 1991.

Looking at the corruption and unpopularity of the Karzai government now it seems that 1991 wasn't that long ago.  What you won't learn from the National War College is that all forms of intervention in Afghanistan or any nation are doomed to failure.  Like it says at the end of this report from 1991, in the Afghanistan of 2010 we need to:

• Cease military action
• Discuss a political settlement with the regional powers, e.g. the Shanghai Cooperation Organization
• Continue humanitarian assistance through "other channels" i.e. ones without political loyalty to the US.